MANJEET SINGH(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP(Not Applicable) — CRMPM/452/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010146882026

Filing Number

CRMPM/2026/2026

Filing Date

20-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRMPM/452/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANJEET SINGH(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Kulwant Singh Gill,Pankaj Mehta,Pankaj Mehta, ,Pankaj Mehta

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh granted regular bail to Manjeet Singh, accused under the NDPS Act for possession of 2.820 kg of charas (commercial quantity), primarily on grounds of inordinate delay in trial where only 6 of 28 prosecution witnesses have been examined after 21 months of incarceration, holding that prolonged detention violates the constitutional right to speedy trial under Article 21. The court imposed stringent bail conditions including a personal bond of Rs. 5 lakh with sureties and restrictions on leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

  5. 20-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMPM/452/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh granted regular bail to Manjeet Singh, accused under the NDPS Act for possession of 2.820 kg of charas (commercial quantity), primarily on grounds of inordinate delay in trial where only 6 of 28 prosecution witnesses have been examined after 21 months of incarceration, holding that prolonged detention violates the constitutional right to speedy trial under Article 21. The court imposed stringent bail conditions including a personal bond of Rs. 5 lakh with sureties and restrictions on leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case