POONAM KUMARI(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/4024/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010146252026

Filing Number

CWP/12595/2026

Filing Date

20-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWP/4024/2026

Registration Date

28-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.POONAM KUMARI(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Chander Narayan Singh,Nidhi Singh,Nidhi Singh, ,Nidhi Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Susheel Gautam,AG 1123

  2. 2.The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (HoFF)(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.The Himachal Pradesh Natural Resources Management Society (HPNRMS)(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.Integrated Development Project(IDP),(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    The Himachal Pradesh High Court allowed Poonam Kumari's petition for regularization of contractual service as a Social Extension Officer, finding her case identical to the Sant Ram precedent which was finalized by the Supreme Court. The court directed the state to regularize her services from the due date with notional and actual benefits retroactive to three years before the original petition filing, to be completed within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/4024/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Himachal Pradesh High Court allowed Poonam Kumari's petition for regularization of contractual service as a Social Extension Officer, finding her case identical to the Sant Ram precedent which was finalized by the Supreme Court. The court directed the state to regularize her services from the due date with notional and actual benefits retroactive to three years before the original petition filing, to be completed within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case