YOG RAJ(Not Applicable) vs Himachal Pradesh Power Corporation Ltd through its Managing Director(Not Applicable) — CWP/3865/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010146142026

Filing Number

CWP/12584/2026

Filing Date

20-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWP/3865/2026

Registration Date

25-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.YOG RAJ(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Rajesh Kumar, ,Rakesh Chauhan

  2. 2.Sharvan Kumar(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Pritam Singh(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.Salochana Devi(Not Applicable)

  5. 5.Arti Devi(Not Applicable)

  6. 6.Prem Krishan(Not Applicable)

  7. 7.Mast Ram(Not Applicable)

  8. 8.Rameshwari Kumari(Not Applicable)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Himachal Pradesh Power Corporation Ltd through its Managing Director(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Hamender Singh Chandel,Hamender Singh Chandel,Manohar Lal Sharma 1123

  2. 2.The Executive Director (Personnel),(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.National Institute of Electronics and Information Technology (NIELIT),(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    In CWP No.3865 of 2026 (Yog Raj & Ors. v. HPPCL & Ors.), notice was issued to respondents with six weeks to file replies, with the case listed thereafter. The accompanying CMP No.5566 of 2026 was disposed of with an order maintaining status quo regarding the petitioners' engagement and posting, prohibiting any adverse action against them without court leave. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/3865/2026

casestatus.in Summary

In CWP No.3865 of 2026 (Yog Raj & Ors. v. HPPCL & Ors.), notice was issued to respondents with six weeks to file replies, with the case listed thereafter. The accompanying CMP No.5566 of 2026 was disposed of with an order maintaining status quo regarding the petitioners' engagement and posting, prohibiting any adverse action against them without court leave. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case