DAN SINGH RATHORE AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) vs THE UOI AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/6757/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010146092026

Filing Number

CWP/12579/2026

Filing Date

20-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWP/6757/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DAN SINGH RATHORE AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Arsh Rattan,Shagun Sharma,Shagun Sharma, ,Shagun Sharma

  2. 2.Vinod Anand(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Madhu Bala(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.Sh. Rakesh Kuma(Not Applicable)

  5. 5.Sher Singh(Not Applicable)

  6. 6.Anil Kumar Sharma(Not Applicable)

  7. 7.Kamlesh Singh Chauhan(Not Applicable)

  8. 8.Partap Singh Verma(Not Applicable)

  9. 9.Ashok Bhalla(Not Applicable)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE UOI AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Srishti Negi,DSGI 1123

  2. 2.Employees Provident Fund Organisation(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Regional Provident Fund Commissioner,(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.Assistant Provident Fund Commissione(Not Applicable)

  5. 5.SJVNL,(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    Summary of CWP No.6757 of 2026 The court issued notices to all respondents with a return date of 25.06.2026, directing service within two weeks. Respondent No.1 (UOI) was ordered to file a reply meanwhile. The court clarified that petition pendency shall not prevent parties from pursuing amicable settlement as represented by the petitioner. The case was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/6757/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CWP No.6757 of 2026 The court issued notices to all respondents with a return date of 25.06.2026, directing service within two weeks. Respondent No.1 (UOI) was ordered to file a reply meanwhile. The court clarified that petition pendency shall not prevent parties from pursuing amicable settlement as represented by the petitioner. The case was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case