SANDEEP VERMA AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) vs THE UOI AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/6758/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010146072026

Filing Number

CWP/12577/2026

Filing Date

20-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWP/6758/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANDEEP VERMA AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Arsh Rattan,Shagun Sharma,Shagun Sharma, ,Shagun Sharma

  2. 2.Soban Singh Manral(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Rakesh Kumar Ahirwar(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.Sh. Mukul tirkey(Not Applicable)

  5. 5.Roshan Lal Negi(Not Applicable)

  6. 6.Nagraj(Not Applicable)

  7. 7.Supriya Chattejee(Not Applicable)

  8. 8.Tara Chand Sharma(Not Applicable)

  9. 9.Shallinder Singh(Not Applicable)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE UOI AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Srishti Negi,DSGI 1123

  2. 2.Employees Provident Fund Organisation(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Regional Provident Fund Commissioner,(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner,(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP 6758/2026 Outcome: The petition was adjourned. Notices were issued to remaining respondents returnable for 25.06.2026, with service to be completed within two weeks. Respondent No.1 was directed to file a reply meanwhile. The court encouraged amicable settlement between parties without prejudicing the petition's pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/6758/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP 6758/2026 Outcome: The petition was adjourned. Notices were issued to remaining respondents returnable for 25.06.2026, with service to be completed within two weeks. Respondent No.1 was directed to file a reply meanwhile. The court encouraged amicable settlement between parties without prejudicing the petition's pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case