ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD(Not Applicable) vs HAMIDA BEGUM AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) Advocate - Pawan Kumar Sharma, ,NEMO,Vivek Chandel,Jagdish Thakur — FAO/340/2018
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173. Disposed: Contested--Remanded for retrial on 07th May 2026.
CNR: HPHC010140862018
Filing Number
FAO/11468/2018
Filing Date
06-Jul-2018
Registration No
FAO/340/2018
Registration Date
16-Jul-2018
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Remanded for retrial
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD(Not Applicable)
Adv. Jagdish Thakur,Narender Sharma,Narender Sharma, ,Jagdish Thakur,Narender Sharma
Respondent(s)
-
1.HAMIDA BEGUM AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) Advocate - Pawan Kumar Sharma, ,NEMO,Vivek Chandel,Jagdish Thakur
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
Summary of FAO/340/2018 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh set aside the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award of Rs. 11,37,000 compensation to claimants (Hamida Begum and others) and remanded the case for retrial. The court found that the tribunal improperly fastened liability on the motorcycle insurer without framing an issue regarding the motorcycle driver's negligence, and without allowing the newly impleaded motorcycle parties (added in November 2016) a fair opportunity to defend themselves. The court ordered the tribunal to re-frame all issues, allow claimants to amend their petition, grant the motorcycle insurer a chance to file a reply, and conduct fresh evidence proceedings with a six-month deadline. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
-
09-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
04-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen VaidyaView PDF
-
04-Dec-2025
—
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya
-
10-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen VaidyaView PDF
-
13-Aug-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya
-
06-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen VaidyaView PDF
-
06-Aug-2025
Final Disposal At The Admission Stage
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya
-
04-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen VaidyaView PDF
-
04-Aug-2025
Final Disposal At The Admission Stage
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya
-
04-Apr-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen VaidyaView PDF
-
04-Apr-2025
Final Disposal At The Admission Stage
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya
-
07-Mar-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen VaidyaView PDF
-
12-Nov-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan SharmaView PDF
-
18-Sep-2024
Orders
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya
-
18-Sep-2024
Orders
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
-
18-Sep-2024
Orders
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
-
18-Sep-2024
Orders
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
-
24-Jul-2024
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
-
02-Jan-2023
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
19-Dec-2022
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
-
28-Nov-2022
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
31-May-2022
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
23-May-2022
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
09-May-2022
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
16-Dec-2019
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sureshwar ThakurView PDF
-
12-Jul-2019
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sureshwar ThakurView PDF
-
18-Jun-2019
Orders
Additional Registrar(j)
-
28-Mar-2019
Orders
Additional Registrar(j)
-
24-Dec-2018
Orders
Additional Registrar(j)
-
19-Jul-2018
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sureshwar ThakurView PDF
-
19-Jul-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Jul-2018
Case filed
Registration No. FAO/340/2018
Summary of FAO/340/2018 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh set aside the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award of Rs. 11,37,000 compensation to claimants (Hamida Begum and others) and remanded the case for retrial. The court found that the tribunal improperly fastened liability on the motorcycle insurer without framing an issue regarding the motorcycle driver's negligence, and without allowing the newly impleaded motorcycle parties (added in November 2016) a fair opportunity to defend themselves. The court ordered the tribunal to re-frame all issues, allow claimants to amend their petition, grant the motorcycle insurer a chance to file a reply, and conduct fresh evidence proceedings with a six-month deadline. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts