PRANESH SODHI(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/3447/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010140852026

Filing Number

CWP/12120/2026

Filing Date

19-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWP/3447/2026

Registration Date

19-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRANESH SODHI(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Tek Chand Sharma,Kartik Kumar,Kartik Kumar, ,Kartik Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.Director Industries, Directorate of Industries(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.General Manager, District Industries Centre(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the writ petition without examining the merits, allowing petitioner Pranesh Sodhi to file a fresh representation to the state authorities within two weeks with all supporting documents to demonstrate that his industrial unit had commenced operations. The court directed the authorities to reconsider the representation within three weeks while giving the petitioner a hearing opportunity, as the original cancellation decision may have been different had complete documentation been available. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

  5. 19-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/3447/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the writ petition without examining the merits, allowing petitioner Pranesh Sodhi to file a fresh representation to the state authorities within two weeks with all supporting documents to demonstrate that his industrial unit had commenced operations. The court directed the authorities to reconsider the representation within three weeks while giving the petitioner a hearing opportunity, as the original cancellation decision may have been different had complete documentation been available. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case