RAVINDER KUMAR(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP(Not Applicable) Advocate - AG — CR.R/198/2016
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HPHC010140362016
Filing Number
CR.R/20180/2016
Filing Date
12-Jul-2016
Registration No
CR.R/198/2016
Registration Date
18-Jul-2016
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla
Bench Type
Single
Category
CRIMINAL REVISION ( 31 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAVINDER KUMAR(Not Applicable)
Adv. Rajesh Mandhotra
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HP(Not Applicable) Advocate - AG
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
23-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF
Summary: In Cr. Revision No. 198/2016, petitioner Ravinder Kumar sought revision before the High Court of Himachal Pradesh. On 23rd March 2026, the court adjourned the matter for hearing after four weeks at the request of the petitioner's counsel. No substantive order on bail or the merits was passed; the case was merely listed for future hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan SharmaView PDF
-
31-Dec-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi
-
22-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander NegiView PDF
-
22-Dec-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla
-
15-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF
-
05-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF
-
21-Jun-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Jul-2016
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh ThakurView PDF
-
12-Jul-2016
Case filed
Registration No. CR.R/198/2016
Summary: In Cr. Revision No. 198/2016, petitioner Ravinder Kumar sought revision before the High Court of Himachal Pradesh. On 23rd March 2026, the court adjourned the matter for hearing after four weeks at the request of the petitioner's counsel. No substantive order on bail or the merits was passed; the case was merely listed for future hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts