PAWAN KUMAR(Not Applicable) vs KAMAL JEET(Not Applicable) — CR.R/159/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438/442. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010137002026

Filing Number

CR.R/1894/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

CR.R/159/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438/442

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PAWAN KUMAR(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Surender K. Sharma,Anita Parmar,Anita Parmar, ,Anita Parmar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KAMAL JEET(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF

    Case Summary: CR.R /159/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed Pawan Kumar's revision petition challenging the trial court's order that rejected his application for handwriting comparison of a disputed cheque in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case. Key Reasoning: The court held that orders dismissing applications for additional evidence/handwriting comparison are interlocutory orders not amenable to revision under Section 397(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. Additionally, the trial court properly dismissed the application because: (1) the accused failed to provide admitted handwriting samples for comparison; (2) he had alternative remedies, including examining his father as a witness; and (3) the application was premature without supporting evidence that he had actually lost the cheque. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CR.R/159/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CR.R /159/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed Pawan Kumar's revision petition challenging the trial court's order that rejected his application for handwriting comparison of a disputed cheque in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case. Key Reasoning: The court held that orders dismissing applications for additional evidence/handwriting comparison are interlocutory orders not amenable to revision under Section 397(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. Additionally, the trial court properly dismissed the application because: (1) the accused failed to provide admitted handwriting samples for comparison; (2) he had alternative remedies, including examining his father as a witness; and (3) the application was premature without supporting evidence that he had actually lost the cheque. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case