POONAM SHARMA(Not Applicable) vs Pawan Kumar AND ANR(Not Applicable) Advocate - P M Negi, ,Sunny Rawat,Shivani,Davinder Singh Nainta,P M Negi,AG — CR.A/435/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 413. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010133252025

Filing Number

CR.A/2301/2025

Filing Date

22-Mar-2025

Registration No

CR.A/435/2025

Registration Date

29-Jul-2025

Judge

Additional Registrar(j)

Coram

Additional Registrar(j)

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 413

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.POONAM SHARMA(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Nishant Khidtta,Nitika Khidtta,Nitika Khidtta, ,V D Khidta,Nitika Khidtta

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pawan Kumar AND ANR(Not Applicable) Advocate - P M Negi, ,Sunny Rawat,Shivani,Davinder Singh Nainta,P M Negi,AG

  2. 2.STATE OF HP(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 26-May-2026

    Additional Registrar(j)View PDF

    Case Summary - CR.A 435/2025 On 26.05.2026, the court noted that an application seeking extension of time was filed by respondent No. 1 on 20.04.2026 but remains under objection in the Registry. Respondent No. 1 failed to appear, but was directed to follow up with the scrutiny section to resolve the pending application objection. The case was adjourned pending clearance of the extension application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Additional Registrar(j)View PDF

  4. 20-Apr-2026

    Additional Registrar(j)View PDF

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Additional Registrar(j)View PDF

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Additional Registrar(j)

  7. 22-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CR.A/435/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary - CR.A 435/2025 On 26.05.2026, the court noted that an application seeking extension of time was filed by respondent No. 1 on 20.04.2026 but remains under objection in the Registry. Respondent No. 1 failed to appear, but was directed to follow up with the scrutiny section to resolve the pending application objection. The case was adjourned pending clearance of the extension application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case