MEENA SHARMA(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/3464/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010132572026

Filing Number

CWP/11396/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWP/3464/2026

Registration Date

19-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MEENA SHARMA(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Atharv Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Rajesh Kosh,AG 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP No. 3464 of 2026 Court Decision: The Himachal Pradesh High Court disposed of the petition by directing the Competent Authority to decide the petitioner Meena Shama's representations within eight weeks from the judgment date (March 23, 2026), considering the averments made in those representations. Key Reasoning: The petitioner's counsel requested disposal of the petition by directing decision on representations already filed with the respondent-Department within a time-bound period. The court accepted this submission and issued the directive accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/3464/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP No. 3464 of 2026 Court Decision: The Himachal Pradesh High Court disposed of the petition by directing the Competent Authority to decide the petitioner Meena Shama's representations within eight weeks from the judgment date (March 23, 2026), considering the averments made in those representations. Key Reasoning: The petitioner's counsel requested disposal of the petition by directing decision on representations already filed with the respondent-Department within a time-bound period. The court accepted this submission and issued the directive accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case