SHUBHAM(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP(Not Applicable) — CRMMO/229/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.

Next hearing 17-Apr-2026

CNR: HPHC010131402026

Filing Number

CRMMO/1850/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRMMO/229/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHUBHAM(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Arsh Chauhan

  2. 2.RISHABH(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.RAHEEM(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.ARVIND(Not Applicable)

  5. 5.SACHIN(Not Applicable)

  6. 6.AMAN(Not Applicable)

  7. 7.ASHOK(Not Applicable)

  8. 8.BRIJ LAL(Not Applicable)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.RAMAN TOMAR(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. 17-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF

    The case Shubham & ors. vs. State of HP & anr. (Cr. MMO No. 229 of 2026) was adjourned by the court on 25.3.2026. The court ordered parties to be produced before it on 17.4.2026 for further proceedings. No substantive order on bail or petition was passed at this stage, as it was a preliminary hearing with notice waived by the Additional Advocate General. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMMO/229/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The case Shubham & ors. vs. State of HP & anr. (Cr. MMO No. 229 of 2026) was adjourned by the court on 25.3.2026. The court ordered parties to be produced before it on 17.4.2026 for further proceedings. No substantive order on bail or petition was passed at this stage, as it was a preliminary hearing with notice waived by the Additional Advocate General. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case