MANJEET(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP(Not Applicable) — CRMMO/226/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.

Next hearing 17-Apr-2026

CNR: HPHC010131392026

Filing Number

CRMMO/1849/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRMMO/226/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANJEET(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Arthav Gharaik

  2. 2.SURJAN(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.AMAN(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.RAMAN(Not Applicable)

  5. 5.PARDEEP(Not Applicable)

  6. 6.PIYUSH(Not Applicable)

  7. 7.LOVELY(Not Applicable)

  8. 8.AMAN(Not Applicable)

  9. 9.TANUJ(Not Applicable)

  10. 10.ADITYA TOMAR(Not Applicable)

  11. 11.NIKHIL(Not Applicable)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.RISHABH(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. 17-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF

    In Cr. MMO No. 226 of 2026, the case of Manjeet & ors. vs. State of HP & anr. was adjourned on 25.3.2026. The court ordered both parties to be produced before the court on 17.4.2026 for further hearing. Service of notice was waived by the Additional Advocate General on behalf of the respondent-State. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMMO/226/2026

casestatus.in Summary

In Cr. MMO No. 226 of 2026, the case of Manjeet & ors. vs. State of HP & anr. was adjourned on 25.3.2026. The court ordered both parties to be produced before the court on 17.4.2026 for further hearing. Service of notice was waived by the Additional Advocate General on behalf of the respondent-State. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case