SHIPRA SAINI(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/5557/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010130642026

Filing Number

CWP/11214/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWP/5557/2026

Registration Date

18-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHIPRA SAINI(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Kishore Pundeer

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.The State of Himachal Pradesh, through Principal Secretary (Edu.)(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.he Director, School Education, Govt. of H.P.,(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.The Deputy Director, School Education,(Not Applicable)

  5. 5.Principal, Government Senior Secondary School,(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of Shipra Saini's petition, finding she approached the court directly without first exhausting administrative remedies before the competent authority. The court directed that if the petitioner files a representation within 4 weeks, the authority must decide it within 12 weeks by passing a reasoned order in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/5557/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of Shipra Saini's petition, finding she approached the court directly without first exhausting administrative remedies before the competent authority. The court directed that if the petitioner files a representation within 4 weeks, the authority must decide it within 12 weeks by passing a reasoned order in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case