VIKRANT SOOD(Not Applicable) vs RAM KUMARI(Not Applicable) Advocate - NEMO, DEEPAK GUPTA ( FOR CAVEATOR/RESPONDENT - — CR/86/2015

Case under Urban Rent Cotrol Act, 1987 Section 24(5). Next hearing: 06th July 2026.

CNR: HPHC010125422015

Next Hearing

06th July 2026

Filing Number

CR/20067/2015

Filing Date

18-05-2015

Registration No

CR/86/2015

Registration Date

27-06-2015

Judge

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JIYA LAL BHARDWAJ

Coram

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JIYA LAL BHARDWAJ

Bench Type

Single

Category

CIVIL REVISION ( 18 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Acts & Sections

Urban Rent Cotrol Act, 1987 Section 24(5)

Petitioner(s)

VIKRANT SOOD(Not Applicable)

Adv. Anuj Gupta

Respondent(s)

RAM KUMARI(Not Applicable) Advocate - NEMO, DEEPAK GUPTA ( FOR CAVEATOR/RESPONDENT -

,Deepak Gupta,R-1,3,4

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JIYA LAL BHARDWAJ

25-07-2017

ORDERS

06-07-2026

ADMISSION AFTER NOTICE

04-05-2026

ADMISSION AFTER NOTICE

03-03-2026

ADMISSION AFTER NOTICE

06-01-2026

ADMISSION AFTER NOTICE

Orders

17-04-2018
04-05-2026
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JIYA LAL BHARDWAJ

Case Summary: In Civil Revision No. 86 of 2015 (Vikrant Sood v. Ram Kumari & Ors.), the court accepted the parties' joint prayer for amicable settlement and referred the matter to mediation. Mr. G.D. Verma, Senior Counsel, was appointed as mediator with a mandate to submit his report within two months. The case was adjourned and listed for 06.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In Civil Revision No. 86 of 2015 (Vikrant Sood v. Ram Kumari & Ors.), the court accepted the parties' joint prayer for amicable settlement and referred the matter to mediation. Mr. G.D. Verma, Senior Counsel, was appointed as mediator with a mandate to submit his report within two months. The case was adjourned and listed for 06.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case