KURAM DUTT(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/2979/2024

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010125072024

Filing Number

CWP/9795/2024

Filing Date

06-Apr-2024

Registration No

CWP/2979/2024

Registration Date

08-Apr-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 14-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KURAM DUTT(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Ashwani Gupta,Abhendra Gupta,Abhendra Gupta, ,Abhendra Gupta

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.The Engineer-in-Chief, I and PH(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.The Superintending Engineer,(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.The Executive Engineer,(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    In CWP No. 2979 of 2024 (Kuram Dutt Vs. State of H.P. & Ors.), the court adjourned the case for further hearing. The petition was listed after six weeks as prayed for by the petitioner's counsel, with both parties present through their respective advocates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

  4. 31-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

  5. 27-Jun-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

  6. 20-Dec-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

  7. 20-Aug-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

  8. 09-Apr-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

  9. 09-Apr-2024

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  10. 06-Apr-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/2979/2024

casestatus.in Summary

In CWP No. 2979 of 2024 (Kuram Dutt Vs. State of H.P. & Ors.), the court adjourned the case for further hearing. The petition was listed after six weeks as prayed for by the petitioner's counsel, with both parties present through their respective advocates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case