MOHINI KUMARI(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/3494/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010124612026

Filing Number

CWP/10660/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWP/3494/2026

Registration Date

20-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHINI KUMARI(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Sonia Saini,Suresh Singh Saini,Suresh Singh Saini, ,Suresh Singh Saini

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.The Secretary (Finance)(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.The Director of School Education,(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    Summary: CWP/3494/2026 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of petitioner Smt. Mohini Kumari's writ petition by directing the Competent Authority to decide her representation (filed with the respondent Department) within eight weeks, considering the averments made therein. The court accepted the petitioner's counsel's submission to resolve the matter through administrative decision-making rather than full adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/3494/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: CWP/3494/2026 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of petitioner Smt. Mohini Kumari's writ petition by directing the Competent Authority to decide her representation (filed with the respondent Department) within eight weeks, considering the averments made therein. The court accepted the petitioner's counsel's submission to resolve the matter through administrative decision-making rather than full adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case