PANKAJ SHARMA(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP(Not Applicable) — CRMPM/395/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 31st March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010124362026

Filing Number

CRMPM/1795/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRMPM/395/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

31-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PANKAJ SHARMA(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Anuj Bali,Ajay Kumar,Ajay Kumar, ,Ajay Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF

    The Himachal Pradesh High Court dismissed Pankaj Sharma's bail petition, holding that prima facie evidence connects him to setting a fire at the informant's house motivated by rejected marriage proposals. The court found the charges under BNS Sections 326(g), 351(2), and 62 (carrying life imprisonment) are sufficiently serious, and there are reasonable grounds to believe the petitioner would repeat the offense or interfere with investigation if released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMPM/395/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Himachal Pradesh High Court dismissed Pankaj Sharma's bail petition, holding that prima facie evidence connects him to setting a fire at the informant's house motivated by rejected marriage proposals. The court found the charges under BNS Sections 326(g), 351(2), and 62 (carrying life imprisonment) are sufficiently serious, and there are reasonable grounds to believe the petitioner would repeat the offense or interfere with investigation if released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case