POWER GRID HIMACHAL TRANSMISSION LTD(Not Applicable) vs SUNDER SINGH AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) Advocate - Parmod Singh Thakur, ,Nipun Thakur — CWP/4761/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HPHC010122212025
Filing Number
CWP/10113/2025
Filing Date
19-Mar-2025
Registration No
CWP/4761/2025
Registration Date
01-Apr-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Coram
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.POWER GRID HIMACHAL TRANSMISSION LTD(Not Applicable)
Adv. Narender Sharma,Minakshi Sharma,Minakshi Sharma, ,Minakshi Sharma
Respondent(s)
-
1.SUNDER SINGH AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) Advocate - Parmod Singh Thakur, ,Nipun Thakur
-
2.Sh Rajender Singh(Not Applicable)
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
In CWP No.4761/2025, Power Grid Himachal Transmission Ltd v. Sunder Singh and another, the court heard arguments from both parties on 07.05.2026. The court ordered that a rejoinder be filed within two weeks and listed the matter thereafter for further hearing. No final order on merits was passed; the case was adjourned for continuation of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
-
14-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
-
07-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
09-Jul-2025
Additional Registrar(j)View PDF
-
23-May-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
02-Apr-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
02-Apr-2025
Office Objection
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel
-
19-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/4761/2025
In CWP No.4761/2025, Power Grid Himachal Transmission Ltd v. Sunder Singh and another, the court heard arguments from both parties on 07.05.2026. The court ordered that a rejoinder be filed within two weeks and listed the matter thereafter for further hearing. No final order on merits was passed; the case was adjourned for continuation of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts