SATPAL AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) vs NIRANJAN SINGH(Not Applicable) Advocate - Divya Raj Singh, ,Karan Veer Singh,Ritu Singh,NEMO — COPC/607/2025
Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 10. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HPHC010120082025
Filing Number
COPC/9939/2025
Filing Date
18-Mar-2025
Registration No
COPC/607/2025
Registration Date
28-Jun-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SATPAL AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)
Adv. Onkar Jairath,Piyush,Piyush, ,Anshul Jairath,Piyush Mehta
-
2.JARMAIL SINGH(Not Applicable)
Respondent(s)
-
1.NIRANJAN SINGH(Not Applicable) Advocate - Divya Raj Singh, ,Karan Veer Singh,Ritu Singh,NEMO
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
23-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF
Case COPC/607/2025 Summary: In Satpal & anr. v. Niranjan Singh, heard on 23.03.2026, the petitioner's counsel informed the court that a rejoinder had been filed in the Registry. The court directed the Registry to place the rejoinder on record if in order and adjourned the case to be listed when the rejoinder is taken on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF
-
31-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
31-Dec-2025
Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel
-
18-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
18-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
08-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
26-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
28-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
04-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
04-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. COPC/607/2025
Case COPC/607/2025 Summary: In Satpal & anr. v. Niranjan Singh, heard on 23.03.2026, the petitioner's counsel informed the court that a rejoinder had been filed in the Registry. The court directed the Registry to place the rejoinder on record if in order and adjourned the case to be listed when the rejoinder is taken on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts