SHARDA(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/2939/2024

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010118222024

Filing Number

CWP/9266/2024

Filing Date

03-Apr-2024

Registration No

CWP/2939/2024

Registration Date

05-Apr-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHARDA(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Chander Narayan Singh,Susheel Gautam,Susheel Gautam, ,Susheel Gautam

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.The Chief Conservator of Forest,(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.The Himachal Pradesh Natural Resources Management Society(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.The District Project Officer,(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh allowed Smt. Sharda's petition seeking regularization of her contractual services as a Social Extension Officer in the Forest Department. The court held that the petitioner's case was similar to Sant Ram's case (which had been decided favorably and upheld by the Supreme Court), and since the state itself admitted this similarity in its reply, the petitioner was entitled to identical benefits. The court directed regularization of services from the due date notionally, with actual benefits accruing three years before the petition filing, to be completed within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Aug-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

  4. 13-Aug-2024

    Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

  5. 30-May-2024

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  6. 08-Apr-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

  7. 08-Apr-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 03-Apr-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/2939/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh allowed Smt. Sharda's petition seeking regularization of her contractual services as a Social Extension Officer in the Forest Department. The court held that the petitioner's case was similar to Sant Ram's case (which had been decided favorably and upheld by the Supreme Court), and since the state itself admitted this similarity in its reply, the petitioner was entitled to identical benefits. The court directed regularization of services from the due date notionally, with actual benefits accruing three years before the petition filing, to be completed within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case