KAKU KUMAR(Not Applicable) vs ARUN KUMAR THAKUR(Not Applicable) — CRMMO/228/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010118162026

Filing Number

CRMMO/1704/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRMMO/228/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KAKU KUMAR(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Gurmeet Bhardwaj

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ARUN KUMAR THAKUR(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh allowed the petitioner's plea and quashed the lower court's order closing the petitioner-accused's evidence. While finding no illegality in the original order (noting repeated opportunities were already granted), the court granted one final opportunity as an act of indulgence to lead defense evidence, subject to payment of Rs. 5,000 cost to the respondent and appearance on 8.4.2026, with a warning that failure to comply would automatically revive the closure order with no further opportunities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMMO/228/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh allowed the petitioner's plea and quashed the lower court's order closing the petitioner-accused's evidence. While finding no illegality in the original order (noting repeated opportunities were already granted), the court granted one final opportunity as an act of indulgence to lead defense evidence, subject to payment of Rs. 5,000 cost to the respondent and appearance on 8.4.2026, with a warning that failure to comply would automatically revive the closure order with no further opportunities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case