MANGTU(Not Applicable) AJAY SHARMA, ,Atharv Sharma vs DESH RAJ(Not Applicable) — RSA/386/2011

Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010117952011

Filing Number

RSA/11720/2011

Filing Date

29-Aug-2011

Registration No

RSA/386/2011

Registration Date

01-Jan-2011

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANGTU(Not Applicable) AJAY SHARMA, ,Atharv Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DESH RAJ(Not Applicable)

    Adv. SANJAY JASWAL 1123

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF

    Case Adjourned. In RSA No. 386 of 2011 (Mangtu & anr. vs. Desh Raj & anr.), the court adjourned the matter for three weeks at the request of the appellants' counsel. Respondent No. 4 was absent, and a registered letter had been sent to respondent No. 4 without response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Additional Registrar(j)View PDF

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    Additional Registrar(j)View PDF

  5. 02-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh VermaView PDF

  6. 05-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh VermaView PDF

  7. 07-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh VermaView PDF

  8. 18-Sep-2025

    Additional Registrar(j)View PDF

  9. 22-Aug-2025

    Additional Registrar(j)View PDF

  10. 14-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander NegiView PDF

  11. 17-Sep-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF

  12. 28-May-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF

  13. 28-May-2024

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

  14. 29-Aug-2011

    Case filed

    Registration No. RSA/386/2011

casestatus.in Summary

Case Adjourned. In RSA No. 386 of 2011 (Mangtu & anr. vs. Desh Raj & anr.), the court adjourned the matter for three weeks at the request of the appellants' counsel. Respondent No. 4 was absent, and a registered letter had been sent to respondent No. 4 without response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case