TEK SINGH(Not Applicable) vs RAKESH KANWAR AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — COPC/237/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 12. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 26th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010115592026

Filing Number

COPC/9872/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

COPC/237/2026

Registration Date

02-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

26-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TEK SINGH(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Kush Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAKESH KANWAR AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.Director of School Education(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Deputy Director of Elementary Education(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-May-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed Tek Singh's petition alleging violation of previous court directions. The court found that respondents substantially complied by considering the petitioner's representation per prior orders (dated 24.04.2026). Since the governing precedent (Lalit Sen) was stayed pending appeal, the court held no violation occurred and closed proceedings, reserving liberty for petitioner to seek further remedies as appropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. COPC/237/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed Tek Singh's petition alleging violation of previous court directions. The court found that respondents substantially complied by considering the petitioner's representation per prior orders (dated 24.04.2026). Since the governing precedent (Lalit Sen) was stayed pending appeal, the court held no violation occurred and closed proceedings, reserving liberty for petitioner to seek further remedies as appropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case