DEV KALA(Not Applicable) vs ASHISH SINGHMAR, I.A.S.,(Not Applicable) — COPC/248/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 11,12. Next hearing: 21st May 2026.

Next hearing 21-May-2026

CNR: HPHC010115542026

Filing Number

COPC/9867/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

COPC/248/2026

Registration Date

02-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 11,12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEV KALA(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Rakesh Kumar Dogra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ASHISH SINGHMAR, I.A.S.,(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

Case History

  1. 21-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 21-May-2026

    Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

  3. 14-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

  4. 14-May-2026

    Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

  5. 27-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

    Summary: In COPC No. 248/2026 (Dev Kala Vs. Ashish Singhmar), the case was adjourned to 14.05.2026. The court directed the respondent/State to submit detailed information specifying which documents and information are required from the petitioner to process the claim, as the petitioner had not submitted all requisite documents as per Finance Department queries within reasonable time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

  7. 10-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. COPC/248/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In COPC No. 248/2026 (Dev Kala Vs. Ashish Singhmar), the case was adjourned to 14.05.2026. The court directed the respondent/State to submit detailed information specifying which documents and information are required from the petitioner to process the claim, as the petitioner had not submitted all requisite documents as per Finance Department queries within reasonable time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case