KISHOR KUMAR(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/3448/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010114082026

Filing Number

CWP/9732/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWP/3448/2026

Registration Date

19-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KISHOR KUMAR(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Surila Sangam

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.Director of School Education, Directorate of School Education,(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Deputy Director of School Education,(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the writ petition filed by Kishor Kumar against the State of Himachal Pradesh by directing the Competent Authority to decide the petitioner's representation within 12 weeks, considering the averments made therein. The court accepted the petitioner's counsel's submission to allow the administrative process to proceed with a defined timeline rather than adjudicating the matter itself. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/3448/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the writ petition filed by Kishor Kumar against the State of Himachal Pradesh by directing the Competent Authority to decide the petitioner's representation within 12 weeks, considering the averments made therein. The court accepted the petitioner's counsel's submission to allow the administrative process to proceed with a defined timeline rather than adjudicating the matter itself. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case