RAM CHANDER AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/3905/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010113842026

Filing Number

CWP/9708/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWP/3905/2026

Registration Date

25-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAM CHANDER AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Mohit Thakur

  2. 2.Surjeet Singh(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Uma Devi(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.Vipin Kumar(Not Applicable)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

  2. 2.The Director of Education (Schools) Lalpani(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.The Deputy Director of (School)(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.Principal GSSS Naila(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed the petition by Ram Chander and others for approaching the court directly without first exhausting administrative remedies. The court directed the petitioners to file a representation with the competent authority within four weeks, which must be decided within twelve weeks thereafter in accordance with law, considering the petitioners' submissions and cited judgments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/3905/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed the petition by Ram Chander and others for approaching the court directly without first exhausting administrative remedies. The court directed the petitioners to file a representation with the competent authority within four weeks, which must be decided within twelve weeks thereafter in accordance with law, considering the petitioners' submissions and cited judgments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case