SURESH SHARMA AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/3896/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 01st April 2026.
CNR: HPHC010113832026
Filing Number
CWP/9707/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
CWP/3896/2026
Registration Date
25-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 28-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SURESH SHARMA AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)
Adv. Mohit Thakur
-
2.Seema Devi(Not Applicable)
-
3.Pradeep(Not Applicable)
-
4.Om Prakash Sharma(Not Applicable)
-
5.Anil Kumar(Not Applicable)
-
6.Digvijayender(Not Applicable)
-
7.Natish(Not Applicable)
-
8.Raj Kumar(Not Applicable)
-
9.Manoj Atri(Not Applicable)
-
10.Manoj Sharma(Not Applicable)
-
11.Anil(Not Applicable)
-
12.Pratap Singh(Not Applicable)
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)
-
2.Director of Education ( Schools)(Not Applicable)
-
3.Deputy Director of Education (Schools)(Not Applicable)
-
4.Principal GSSS Kiartoo(Not Applicable)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the petition holding that the petitioners approached the court directly without first exhausting the administrative remedy. The court directed the petitioners to file a representation with the competent authority within four weeks, which must be decided in accordance with law within twelve weeks thereafter, with a speaking order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Notice Before Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/3896/2026
The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the petition holding that the petitioners approached the court directly without first exhausting the administrative remedy. The court directed the petitioners to file a representation with the competent authority within four weeks, which must be decided in accordance with law within twelve weeks thereafter, with a speaking order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts