ROOPA DEVI(Not Applicable) Vipin Pandit, ,Parikshit Sharma vs Ram Kumar Verma and others(Not Applicable) — CRMMO/269/2024

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 482. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010113272024

Filing Number

CRMMO/2419/2024

Filing Date

01-Apr-2024

Registration No

CRMMO/269/2024

Registration Date

19-Apr-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed Off

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ROOPA DEVI(Not Applicable) Vipin Pandit, ,Parikshit Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ram Kumar Verma and others(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Nitin Sood,Rakesh Thakur,Kulwant Singh Katoch,Akshay Katoch,Amit Sharma,Sanjeev Sood,Amit Sharma 1123

  2. 2.Nand Lal(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Med Ram(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.Rajender Kumar(Not Applicable)

  5. 5.Jagdish Chand(Not Applicable)

  6. 6.Laxmi Chand(Not Applicable)

  7. 7.Shyam Dutt(Not Applicable)

  8. 8.Chain Singh(Not Applicable)

  9. 9.Puran Chand(Not Applicable)

  10. 10.Madan Lal(Not Applicable)

  11. 11.Vinod Kumar(Not Applicable)

  12. 12.Sanjay(Not Applicable)

  13. 13.Rakesh(Not Applicable)

  14. 14.Gian Chand(Not Applicable)

  15. 15.Suresh Kumar(Not Applicable)

  16. 16.Dhani Ram(Not Applicable)

  17. 17.Amlok Ram(Not Applicable)

  18. 18.Pardeep Singh(Not Applicable)

  19. 19.Het Ram(Not Applicable)

  20. 20.Hari Nand(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

    Summary of CRMMO 269/2024 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh quashed and set aside the trial court's order allowing the accused to place documentary evidence (FIR, challan, investigation records) on record under Section 311 CrPC during charge-framing stage. The court held that Section 311 CrPC only empowers courts to summon witnesses or re-examine persons, not admit new documents. Additional documents must be summoned under Section 91 CrPC, which the accused cannot invoke before prosecution evidence closes. The accused has no right to produce materials at the charge-framing stage—such evidence can only be presented during defence arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF

  4. 02-Dec-2025

    Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh

  5. 11-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF

  6. 16-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF

  7. 16-Sep-2025

    Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh

  8. 12-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF

  9. 06-Jun-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF

  10. 26-May-2025

    Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh

  11. 22-Mar-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF

  12. 05-Dec-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander NegiView PDF

  13. 29-Oct-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander NegiView PDF

  14. 18-Sep-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

  15. 06-Aug-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

  16. 29-May-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander NegiView PDF

  17. 20-Apr-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander NegiView PDF

  18. 20-Apr-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander NegiView PDF

  19. 20-Apr-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  20. 01-Apr-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMMO/269/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CRMMO 269/2024 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh quashed and set aside the trial court's order allowing the accused to place documentary evidence (FIR, challan, investigation records) on record under Section 311 CrPC during charge-framing stage. The court held that Section 311 CrPC only empowers courts to summon witnesses or re-examine persons, not admit new documents. Additional documents must be summoned under Section 91 CrPC, which the accused cannot invoke before prosecution evidence closes. The accused has no right to produce materials at the charge-framing stage—such evidence can only be presented during defence arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case