SITA RAM(Not Applicable) vs Ram Kumar Verma and others(Not Applicable) — CRMMO/270/2024
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HPHC010113202024
Filing Number
CRMMO/2416/2024
Filing Date
01-Apr-2024
Registration No
CRMMO/270/2024
Registration Date
19-Apr-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SITA RAM(Not Applicable)
Adv. Vipin Pandit,Parikshit Sharma,Parikshit Sharma, ,Parikshit Sharma
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ram Kumar Verma and others(Not Applicable)
Adv. ,Rakesh Thakur,Nitin Sood,Kulwant Singh Katoch,Akshay Katoch 1123
-
2.Nand Lal(Not Applicable)
-
3.Med Ram(Not Applicable)
-
4.Rajender Kumar(Not Applicable)
-
5.Jagdish Kumar(Not Applicable)
-
6.Laxmi Chand(Not Applicable)
-
7.Shyam Dutt(Not Applicable)
-
8.Chain Singh(Not Applicable)
-
9.Puran Chand(Not Applicable)
-
10.Madan Lal(Not Applicable)
-
11.Vinod Kumar(Not Applicable)
-
12.Sanjay(Not Applicable)
-
13.Rakesh(Not Applicable)
-
14.Gian Chand(Not Applicable)
-
15.Suresh Kumar(Not Applicable)
-
16.Dhani Ram(Not Applicable)
-
17.Amlok Ram(Not Applicable)
-
18.Pardeep Singh(Not Applicable)
-
19.Het Ram(Not Applicable)
-
20.Hari Nand(Not Applicable)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
Case Summary: CRMMO 270/2024 The Himachal Pradesh High Court quashed the trial court's order allowing the accused to place documentary evidence (FIR, challan, investigation proceedings) on record under Section 311 CrPC. The court held that Section 311 CrPC permits only summoning witnesses or recalling examined persons, not admitting documents; additional documents must be sought under Section 91 CrPC. The court emphasized that at the charge-framing stage, the accused has no right to produce materials, which should only be presented during defense evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
02-Dec-2025
Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
-
11-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
16-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
16-Sep-2025
Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
-
16-Sep-2025
Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
-
12-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
06-Jun-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
26-May-2025
Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
-
22-Mar-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
05-Mar-2025
Additional Registrar(j)View PDF
-
26-Dec-2024
Additional Registrar(j)View PDF
-
29-Oct-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander NegiView PDF
-
18-Sep-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
-
06-Aug-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
-
18-Jun-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
-
20-Apr-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander NegiView PDF
-
20-Apr-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Apr-2024
Case filed
Registration No. CRMMO/270/2024
Case Summary: CRMMO 270/2024 The Himachal Pradesh High Court quashed the trial court's order allowing the accused to place documentary evidence (FIR, challan, investigation proceedings) on record under Section 311 CrPC. The court held that Section 311 CrPC permits only summoning witnesses or recalling examined persons, not admitting documents; additional documents must be sought under Section 91 CrPC. The court emphasized that at the charge-framing stage, the accused has no right to produce materials, which should only be presented during defense evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts