THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER HPPWD AND ANR(Not Applicable) vs Shri Nathu Ram(Not Applicable) Advocate - Amit Singh Chandel, ,Amit Singh Chandel — CMP/4854/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010112852026

Filing Number

CMP/9612/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

CMP/4854/2026

Registration Date

19-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 151

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER HPPWD AND ANR(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shri Nathu Ram(Not Applicable) Advocate - Amit Singh Chandel, ,Amit Singh Chandel

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

    Summary of CMP No. 4854/2026: The court allowed Nathu Ram's application under Section 151 CPC for release of a land acquisition award amount with accrued interest from the court registry. The court granted the relief because the award had attained finality after the State's Special Leave Petition challenging the judgment was dismissed, and the State's counsel raised no objection. The amount was ordered released to the applicant's bank account after proper verification and identification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP/4854/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CMP No. 4854/2026: The court allowed Nathu Ram's application under Section 151 CPC for release of a land acquisition award amount with accrued interest from the court registry. The court granted the relief because the award had attained finality after the State's Special Leave Petition challenging the judgment was dismissed, and the State's counsel raised no objection. The amount was ordered released to the applicant's bank account after proper verification and identification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case