SANTOSH DEVI(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/3667/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010110792026

Filing Number

CWP/9425/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWP/3667/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANTOSH DEVI(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Vaibhav Tanwar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.Director(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Deputy Director Elementary Education,(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.Block Elementary Education Officer,(Not Applicable)

  5. 5.Sub-Divisional Officer (Civil)(Not Applicable)

  6. 6.Gram Panchayat Khood Drutrit,(Not Applicable)

  7. 7.President School Management Committee,(Not Applicable)

  8. 8.Additional District Magistrate,(Not Applicable)

  9. 9.Yogesh Kumar,(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    Summary: In CWP No. 3667 of 2026 (Santosh Devi vs State of HP), notice was served on respondents 1-5 and 8, with the State accepting service through the Additional Advocate General. The respondents are directed to file a reply within three weeks, with the case listed thereafter. The interim application (CMP No. 5307 of 2026) was dismissed as no case for interim orders was made out. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/3667/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In CWP No. 3667 of 2026 (Santosh Devi vs State of HP), notice was served on respondents 1-5 and 8, with the State accepting service through the Additional Advocate General. The respondents are directed to file a reply within three weeks, with the case listed thereafter. The interim application (CMP No. 5307 of 2026) was dismissed as no case for interim orders was made out. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case