RAKESH CHAND AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/3600/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010110512026

Filing Number

CWP/9397/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWP/3600/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAKESH CHAND AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Vaibhav Tanwar

  2. 2.Praveen Kumar(Not Applicable)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.Director, Directorate of School Education(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Deputy Director of School Education Una(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    The Himachal Pradesh High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the Competent Authority to decide the petitioners' representations within eight weeks, considering the averments made therein. The court accepted the petitioners' request to have their administrative representations reviewed within a time-bound period rather than adjudicating the matter substantively. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/3600/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Himachal Pradesh High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the Competent Authority to decide the petitioners' representations within eight weeks, considering the averments made therein. The court accepted the petitioners' request to have their administrative representations reviewed within a time-bound period rather than adjudicating the matter substantively. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case