RAVI DADWAL AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/3626/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 25th March 2026.
CNR: HPHC010109732026
Filing Number
CWP/9327/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
CWP/3626/2026
Registration Date
23-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 13-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAVI DADWAL AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)
Adv. Ajeet Singh Saklani
-
2.Raj Kumar, aged about 41 years,(Not Applicable)
-
3.Ashwani Kumar,(Not Applicable)
-
4.Poonam Sharma,(Not Applicable)
-
5.Suman Lata,(Not Applicable)
-
6.Sunita Devi(Not Applicable)
-
7.Suman Chawla, aged about 57 years wife of Shri Kewal Krishan(Not Applicable)
-
8.Shelly Kapoor,(Not Applicable)
-
9.Kiran Bala(Not Applicable)
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)
Adv. AG 1123
-
2.Director of School Education(Not Applicable)
-
3.Deputy Director of Elementary Education(Not Applicable)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the petition and directed the Competent Authority to decide the petitioners' representations within 12 weeks by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. The court found that the petitioners had filed representations regarding issues raised in the petition, but the concerned authority had not decided them till the date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Notice Before Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/3626/2026
The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the petition and directed the Competent Authority to decide the petitioners' representations within 12 weeks by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. The court found that the petitioners had filed representations regarding issues raised in the petition, but the concerned authority had not decided them till the date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts