ABHISHEK SOIN(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP(Not Applicable) — CRMPM/399/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 23rd March 2026.
CNR: HPHC010109452026
Filing Number
CRMPM/1636/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
CRMPM/399/2026
Registration Date
17-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ABHISHEK SOIN(Not Applicable)
Adv. Arjun Lal,Aakash Thakur,Aakash Thakur, ,Vidur Kapur,Aakash Thakur
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HP(Not Applicable)
Adv. AG 1123
-
2.SHO(Not Applicable)
Adv. AG
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
Case Summary: CRMPM/399/2026 Court Decision: The Himachal Pradesh High Court granted absolute bail to Abhishek Soin in an FIR under IPC Section 420 (cheating), finding no necessity for custodial interrogation since he had already joined investigations and was cooperating fully with the investigating agency. Key Reasoning: Justice Sandeep Sharma applied fundamental principles that freedom is paramount and cannot be curtailed on suspicion alone, that the accused is presumed innocent until proven guilty, and that bail is the general rule while imprisonment is the exception. The court imposed standard conditions requiring the petitioner's availability for investigation and trial, non-tampering with evidence, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRMPM/399/2026
Case Summary: CRMPM/399/2026 Court Decision: The Himachal Pradesh High Court granted absolute bail to Abhishek Soin in an FIR under IPC Section 420 (cheating), finding no necessity for custodial interrogation since he had already joined investigations and was cooperating fully with the investigating agency. Key Reasoning: Justice Sandeep Sharma applied fundamental principles that freedom is paramount and cannot be curtailed on suspicion alone, that the accused is presumed innocent until proven guilty, and that bail is the general rule while imprisonment is the exception. The court imposed standard conditions requiring the petitioner's availability for investigation and trial, non-tampering with evidence, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts