VISHAL CHAND KINGGOPA(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/3434/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010107042026

Filing Number

CWP/9068/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWP/3434/2026

Registration Date

19-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VISHAL CHAND KINGGOPA(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Mohamed Ahamed Safee,Pranav Kumar Kaushal,Pranav Kumar Kaushal, ,Sameer Miyan,Pranav Kumar Kaushal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP No. 3434/2026 The Himachal Pradesh High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Shri Vishal Chand Kinggopa against the State of Himachal Pradesh by directing the Competent Authority to decide the petitioner's representation (filed with the respondent Department) within eight weeks, considering the averments made therein. The court accepted the petitioner's counsel's submission to resolve the matter through the administrative decision-making process rather than adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/3434/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP No. 3434/2026 The Himachal Pradesh High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Shri Vishal Chand Kinggopa against the State of Himachal Pradesh by directing the Competent Authority to decide the petitioner's representation (filed with the respondent Department) within eight weeks, considering the averments made therein. The court accepted the petitioner's counsel's submission to resolve the matter through the administrative decision-making process rather than adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case