PARVATI DEVI(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/3432/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010106992026

Filing Number

CWP/9063/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWP/3432/2026

Registration Date

19-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PARVATI DEVI(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Mohamed Ahamed Safee,Pranav Kumar Kaushal,Pranav Kumar Kaushal, ,Sameer Miyan,Pranav Kumar Kaushal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of Smt. Parvati Devi's writ petition by directing the Competent Authority to decide her representation filed with the respondent-Department within eight weeks, considering the averments made therein. The court accepted the petitioner's submission that the matter be resolved through departmental decision-making on the pending representation rather than judicial intervention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/3432/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of Smt. Parvati Devi's writ petition by directing the Competent Authority to decide her representation filed with the respondent-Department within eight weeks, considering the averments made therein. The court accepted the petitioner's submission that the matter be resolved through departmental decision-making on the pending representation rather than judicial intervention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case