BALBIR SINGH AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/2992/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010104522026

Filing Number

CWP/8854/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWP/2992/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BALBIR SINGH AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Nitin Thakur

  2. 2.Mukesh Kumar(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Saroj Kumari(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.Reena Kumari(Not Applicable)

  5. 5.Pawan Kumar(Not Applicable)

  6. 6.Satish Kumar(Not Applicable)

  7. 7.Raj Pal banyal(Not Applicable)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

  2. 2.Secretary (Panchayati Raj) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Deputy Commissioner Hamirpur at Hamirpur(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur,hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan SharmaView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Himachal Pradesh High Court dismissed the petition challenging the creation of Nagar Panchayat Barsar, finding that the notifications dated November 23, 2025 and February 25, 2026 were issued in compliance with constitutional requirements under Article 243Q. The court held that the area qualifies as a transitional area based on population exceeding 2,000, annual revenue exceeding Rs. 5,00,000, presence of numerous institutions, and economic importance, satisfying Article 243Q criteria without requiring all enumerated factors. The court rejected petitioners' objections regarding inclusion of Gram Panchayat Bani, finding they were duly considered by the Principal Secretary in a reasoned order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur,hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan SharmaView PDF

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur,hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan SharmaView PDF

  6. 01-Apr-2026

    Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma

  7. 31-Mar-2026

    Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma

  8. 30-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur,hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan SharmaView PDF

  9. 30-Mar-2026

    Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma

  10. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur,hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan SharmaView PDF

  11. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur,hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan SharmaView PDF

  12. 24-Mar-2026

    Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma

  13. 20-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur,hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan SharmaView PDF

  14. 20-Mar-2026

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma

  15. 17-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur,hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan SharmaView PDF

  16. 17-Mar-2026

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma

  17. 16-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur,hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan SharmaView PDF

  18. 16-Mar-2026

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma

  19. 13-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur,hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan SharmaView PDF

  20. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  21. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/2992/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Himachal Pradesh High Court dismissed the petition challenging the creation of Nagar Panchayat Barsar, finding that the notifications dated November 23, 2025 and February 25, 2026 were issued in compliance with constitutional requirements under Article 243Q. The court held that the area qualifies as a transitional area based on population exceeding 2,000, annual revenue exceeding Rs. 5,00,000, presence of numerous institutions, and economic importance, satisfying Article 243Q criteria without requiring all enumerated factors. The court rejected petitioners' objections regarding inclusion of Gram Panchayat Bani, finding they were duly considered by the Principal Secretary in a reasoned order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case