DEEPANSHU SINGH AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) — CRMMO/217/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010103632026

Filing Number

CRMMO/1585/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRMMO/217/2026

Registration Date

20-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEEPANSHU SINGH AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Dhananjay Singh

  2. 2.Dhruv Gill(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Dhananjay Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.Rashid Ahmad(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

    Case Summary: CrMMO No. 217 of 2026 Petitioners Deepanshu Singh and another sought quashing of FIR No. 24/2026 (registered under Sections 302, 298, 352, and 3(5) BNS 2023) on grounds of compromise between parties. The court accepted a compromise deed but adjourned the matter to verify its genuineness. The case is listed for 25.3.2026 with directions for petitioner and respondent No. 2 to remain present for final orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMMO/217/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CrMMO No. 217 of 2026 Petitioners Deepanshu Singh and another sought quashing of FIR No. 24/2026 (registered under Sections 302, 298, 352, and 3(5) BNS 2023) on grounds of compromise between parties. The court accepted a compromise deed but adjourned the matter to verify its genuineness. The case is listed for 25.3.2026 with directions for petitioner and respondent No. 2 to remain present for final orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case