MAHAVIR GUPTA(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP(Not Applicable) — CRMMO/170/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010101092026

Filing Number

CRMMO/1543/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRMMO/170/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHAVIR GUPTA(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Inderjeet Singh Narwal,Satish Kumar,Satish Kumar, ,Bhishm Sharma,Satish Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

    Case Summary The High Court of Himachal Pradesh allowed the petition and reduced the bail bond requirement from ₹1,00,000 to ₹50,000. The court held that bail bond amounts must be individualized based on an accused's financial circumstances rather than mechanically applied based on charges, citing landmark Supreme Court precedent establishing that poor defendants should not be denied bail solely due to inability to pay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMMO/170/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The High Court of Himachal Pradesh allowed the petition and reduced the bail bond requirement from ₹1,00,000 to ₹50,000. The court held that bail bond amounts must be individualized based on an accused's financial circumstances rather than mechanically applied based on charges, citing landmark Supreme Court precedent establishing that poor defendants should not be denied bail solely due to inability to pay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case