PURNIMA LAPANG(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP(Not Applicable) — CRMPM/341/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 25th March 2026.
CNR: HPHC010101002026
Filing Number
CRMPM/1542/2026
Filing Date
07-Mar-2026
Registration No
CRMPM/341/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 14-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PURNIMA LAPANG(Not Applicable)
Adv. Ram Lal Verma,Saurabh Sharma,Saurabh Sharma, ,Saurabh Sharma
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HP(Not Applicable)
Adv. AG 1123
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF
Summary: The Himachal Pradesh High Court granted regular bail to Purnima Lapang, who was arrested for alleged NDPS Act violations (Sections 21 and 29) after 50.340 grams of heroin was recovered from a room where she was present. Although the court accepted the prosecution's prima facie case that the petitioner was in possession of the contraband under the presumptions of Sections 35 and 54 of the NDPS Act, it allowed bail considering she is a woman with no criminal antecedents, the charge sheet has been filed, and no useful purpose would be served by continued detention. The petitioner was released on ₹1,00,000 bail with strict conditions including non-intimidation of witnesses, regular court attendance, and restrictions on movement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF
-
18-Mar-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla
-
11-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRMPM/341/2026
Summary: The Himachal Pradesh High Court granted regular bail to Purnima Lapang, who was arrested for alleged NDPS Act violations (Sections 21 and 29) after 50.340 grams of heroin was recovered from a room where she was present. Although the court accepted the prosecution's prima facie case that the petitioner was in possession of the contraband under the presumptions of Sections 35 and 54 of the NDPS Act, it allowed bail considering she is a woman with no criminal antecedents, the charge sheet has been filed, and no useful purpose would be served by continued detention. The petitioner was released on ₹1,00,000 bail with strict conditions including non-intimidation of witnesses, regular court attendance, and restrictions on movement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts