THE BLOCK MEDICAL OFFICER-CUM-CHAIRMAN(Not Applicable) vs SHAKUNTLA DEVI(Not Applicable) Advocate - Tek Chand — CWP/3424/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010100662025

Filing Number

CWP/8305/2025

Filing Date

10-Mar-2025

Registration No

CWP/3424/2025

Registration Date

11-Mar-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE BLOCK MEDICAL OFFICER-CUM-CHAIRMAN(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Uday Singh Banyal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHAKUNTLA DEVI(Not Applicable) Advocate - Tek Chand

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed CWP No. 3424/2025, affirming the Labour Court's award directing the Block Medical Officer to reinstate Shakuntla Devi on her original post from her retrenchment date and pay ₹50,000 compensation towards back wages. The court found the petition lacked merit and followed its earlier precedential decision on identical issues involving similarly situated respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

  4. 12-Mar-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

  5. 12-Mar-2025

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  6. 10-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/3424/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed CWP No. 3424/2025, affirming the Labour Court's award directing the Block Medical Officer to reinstate Shakuntla Devi on her original post from her retrenchment date and pay ₹50,000 compensation towards back wages. The court found the petition lacked merit and followed its earlier precedential decision on identical issues involving similarly situated respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case