THE BLOCK MEDICAL OFFICER-CUM-CHAIRMAN(Not Applicable) vs PINKI DEVI(Not Applicable) Advocate - Tek Chand — CWP/3389/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HPHC010100652025
Filing Number
CWP/8304/2025
Filing Date
10-Mar-2025
Registration No
CWP/3389/2025
Registration Date
11-Mar-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Coram
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE BLOCK MEDICAL OFFICER-CUM-CHAIRMAN(Not Applicable)
Adv. Uday Singh Banyal
Respondent(s)
-
1.PINKI DEVI(Not Applicable) Advocate - Tek Chand
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed three consolidated writ petitions (CWP 3389/3390/3424/2025) filed by the Block Medical Officer challenging Labour Court awards that directed reinstatement of three female workers (Pinki Devi, Krishna Devi, and Shakuntla Devi) to their original posts with ₹50,000 compensation for back wages. The court found these petitions were squarely covered by an earlier identical decision and upheld the Labour Court's awards, affirming the workers' reinstatement orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Jun-2025
Additional Registrar(j)View PDF
-
06-May-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
12-Mar-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
12-Mar-2025
Notice Before Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel
-
10-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/3389/2025
The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed three consolidated writ petitions (CWP 3389/3390/3424/2025) filed by the Block Medical Officer challenging Labour Court awards that directed reinstatement of three female workers (Pinki Devi, Krishna Devi, and Shakuntla Devi) to their original posts with ₹50,000 compensation for back wages. The court found these petitions were squarely covered by an earlier identical decision and upheld the Labour Court's awards, affirming the workers' reinstatement orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts