THE BLOCK MEDICAL OFFICER-CUM-CHAIRMAN(Not Applicable) vs KRISHNA DEVI(Not Applicable) Advocate - Tek Chand — CWP/3390/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010100642025

Filing Number

CWP/8303/2025

Filing Date

10-Mar-2025

Registration No

CWP/3390/2025

Registration Date

11-Mar-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE BLOCK MEDICAL OFFICER-CUM-CHAIRMAN(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Uday Singh Banyal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KRISHNA DEVI(Not Applicable) Advocate - Tek Chand

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

    Case CWP/3390/2025 Summary: The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed the Block Medical Officer's writ petition challenging a Labour Court award that directed reinstatement of Krishna Devi (a retrenched workman) to her original position with ₹50,000 compensation for back wages. The Court found the petition lacked merit and affirmed the Labour Court's award, following its earlier precedential decision in a similar case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Jun-2025

    Additional Registrar(j)View PDF

  4. 06-May-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

  5. 12-Mar-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

  6. 12-Mar-2025

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  7. 10-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/3390/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case CWP/3390/2025 Summary: The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed the Block Medical Officer's writ petition challenging a Labour Court award that directed reinstatement of Krishna Devi (a retrenched workman) to her original position with ₹50,000 compensation for back wages. The Court found the petition lacked merit and affirmed the Labour Court's award, following its earlier precedential decision in a similar case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case