STATE OF HP(Not Applicable) vs ONKAR CHAND(Not Applicable) — CR.A/330/2015
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 378. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 23rd March 2026.
CNR: HPHC010098362015
Filing Number
CR.A/20185/2015
Filing Date
20-Apr-2015
Registration No
CR.A/330/2015
Registration Date
31-Aug-2015
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla
Bench Type
Single
Category
CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
APPEAL AGAINST ACQUITTAL FOR OFFENCES UNDER IPC ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF HP(Not Applicable)
Adv. AG
Respondent(s)
-
1.ONKAR CHAND(Not Applicable)
Adv. ,Ankur Dass Sood,NEMO,SUCHITRA SEN 1123
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF
Case Summary: CR.A/330/2015 The Himachal Pradesh High Court dismissed the State's appeal against Onkar Chand's acquittal on charges of wrongful restraint, criminal intimidation, and atrocity under SC&ST Act. The court upheld the trial court's acquittal, finding the prosecution's case doubtful due to: (1) unexplained one-day delay in FIR registration unsubstantiated by police records; (2) inconsistent witness testimonies with significant discrepancies in sequence of events; (3) key witness (Ravi Dutt) denying core allegations; (4) named witness (Prakash Chand) not examined; and (5) absence of medical evidence corroborating claimed physical assault. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF
-
18-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF
-
10-Nov-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla
-
16-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF
-
08-Apr-2016
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Apr-2015
Case filed
Registration No. CR.A/330/2015
Case Summary: CR.A/330/2015 The Himachal Pradesh High Court dismissed the State's appeal against Onkar Chand's acquittal on charges of wrongful restraint, criminal intimidation, and atrocity under SC&ST Act. The court upheld the trial court's acquittal, finding the prosecution's case doubtful due to: (1) unexplained one-day delay in FIR registration unsubstantiated by police records; (2) inconsistent witness testimonies with significant discrepancies in sequence of events; (3) key witness (Ravi Dutt) denying core allegations; (4) named witness (Prakash Chand) not examined; and (5) absence of medical evidence corroborating claimed physical assault. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts