RAVI DUTT SHARMA(Not Applicable) vs R.D. NAZEEM AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — COPC/253/2026
Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 11 & 12. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
CNR: HPHC010097662026
Filing Number
COPC/8267/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
COPC/253/2026
Registration Date
06-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 15-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAVI DUTT SHARMA(Not Applicable)
Adv. Atharv Sharma
Respondent(s)
-
1.R.D. NAZEEM AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)
Adv. ,Raman Jamalta,AG 1123
-
2.Sh. Neeraj Kumar IAS(Not Applicable)
-
3.Nipun Jindal(Not Applicable)
-
4.Naresh Thakur(Not Applicable)
-
5.Sh. Vishva Mohan Dev Chauhan(Not Applicable)
-
6.Kavita Thakur(Not Applicable)
-
7.Sh. Vipin Gupta(Not Applicable)
-
8.Naresh Verma(Not Applicable)
-
9.Ram Prakash(Not Applicable)
-
10.Vikas Jamwal(Not Applicable)
-
11.Rajesh Bhandari(Not Applicable)
-
12.Ankush Sharma(Not Applicable)
-
13.Rajesh Kaushal(Not Applicable)
-
14.Sona Chandel(Not Applicable)
-
15.Naveen Kumar Sharma(Not Applicable)
-
16.Ashok Kumar Kalsi(Not Applicable)
Case History
-
01-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
01-Jun-2026
Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF
Summary: In COPC No.253 of 2026, the case was adjourned to 01.06.2026. The court directed the Registry to trace and place on record a reply filed by respondents No.6, 7 & 14 that was not available on the court record. The Additional Advocate General and counsel for respondent No.3 were granted three weeks' further time to file their replies on behalf of the remaining respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF
-
10-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. COPC/253/2026
Summary: In COPC No.253 of 2026, the case was adjourned to 01.06.2026. The court directed the Registry to trace and place on record a reply filed by respondents No.6, 7 & 14 that was not available on the court record. The Additional Advocate General and counsel for respondent No.3 were granted three weeks' further time to file their replies on behalf of the remaining respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts