M/S HPSFDCL(Not Applicable) vs THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) — CWP/5899/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010097302025

Filing Number

CWP/8004/2025

Filing Date

07-Mar-2025

Registration No

CWP/5899/2025

Registration Date

09-Apr-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S HPSFDCL(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Ashwani K Lal,Ritu Mohan,Ritu Mohan, ,Rajeev Kumar,Vivek Kumar Attri,Praveen Sharma,Aditya Sood,Ritu Mohan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Godawari 1123

  2. 2.Additional Commissioner(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur,hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan SharmaView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed HPSFDCL's petition challenging an Appellate Authority order dated 29.10.2024 under the CGST Act, 2017. The court found that the petitioner had an alternative and efficacious statutory remedy available under Section 112 of the CGST Act by appealing to the Appellate Tribunal, making the writ petition premature and disposed it accordingly with liberty to pursue the appellate remedy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma

  4. 29-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur,hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh VermaView PDF

  5. 29-Dec-2025

    Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma

  6. 10-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur,hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh VermaView PDF

  7. 10-Nov-2025

    Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

  8. 04-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur,hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

  9. 04-Sep-2025

    Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

  10. 18-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur,hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

  11. 18-Aug-2025

    Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

  12. 23-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur,hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

  13. 23-Jul-2025

    Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

  14. 19-May-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan,hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

  15. 19-May-2025

    Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

  16. 15-May-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan,hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

  17. 15-May-2025

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

  18. 10-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan,hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

  19. 10-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  20. 07-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/5899/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed HPSFDCL's petition challenging an Appellate Authority order dated 29.10.2024 under the CGST Act, 2017. The court found that the petitioner had an alternative and efficacious statutory remedy available under Section 112 of the CGST Act by appealing to the Appellate Tribunal, making the writ petition premature and disposed it accordingly with liberty to pursue the appellate remedy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case