THE HPSEBL(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/6479/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HPHC010096652026
Filing Number
CWP/8181/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
CWP/6479/2026
Registration Date
30-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Coram
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE HPSEBL(Not Applicable)
Adv. Dhananjay Sharma
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)
Adv. AG 1123
-
2.The Divisional Commissioner, Kangra Division at Dharamshala,(Not Applicable)
-
3.he Tehsildar Cum-AC 1st Grade,(Not Applicable)
-
4.Smt Neelam Thakur(Not Applicable)
-
5.Smt. Indu(Not Applicable)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
Case Summary: CWP/6479/2026 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed HPSEBL's writ petition challenging a land dispute resolution. HPSEBL acquired land in 1982 including Khasra No. 1141, but during 1991-92 settlement operations, disputed land (Khasra 2939/2378) was recorded as belonging to private respondents, originating from old Khasra 1140 which was never acquired by HPSEBL. The court upheld the Divisional Commissioner's dismissal, holding that HPSEBL cannot retroactively challenge the 1978-79 consolidation operations or claim the disputed land was incorrectly separated from its acquired plot, and that the State cannot claim adverse possession over private citizens' property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Office Objection
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/6479/2026
Case Summary: CWP/6479/2026 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed HPSEBL's writ petition challenging a land dispute resolution. HPSEBL acquired land in 1982 including Khasra No. 1141, but during 1991-92 settlement operations, disputed land (Khasra 2939/2378) was recorded as belonging to private respondents, originating from old Khasra 1140 which was never acquired by HPSEBL. The court upheld the Divisional Commissioner's dismissal, holding that HPSEBL cannot retroactively challenge the 1978-79 consolidation operations or claim the disputed land was incorrectly separated from its acquired plot, and that the State cannot claim adverse possession over private citizens' property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts