NCB SUB ZONE MANDI(Not Applicable) vs SANDEEP SINGH AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CRMMO/185/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HPHC010096112026
Filing Number
CRMMO/1471/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
CRMMO/185/2026
Registration Date
16-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NCB SUB ZONE MANDI(Not Applicable)
Adv. Dev Raj
Respondent(s)
-
1.SANDEEP SINGH AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)
-
2.Mangal Singh(Not Applicable)
-
3.Narinder Kumar(Not Applicable)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF
Case Summary: NCB v. Sandeep Singh & Others (Cr. MMO 185/2026) The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed the NCB's petition challenging the trial magistrate's orders regarding inventory certification in a drug seizure case. The NCB claimed vehicles were produced before the magistrate but inadvertently omitted from the certified inventory; however, the magistrate's order explicitly stated no vehicles were presented. The court held that once a magistrate's order records what transpired during hearing, such factual statements are conclusive and cannot be contradicted in higher courts. The NCB should have immediately approached the magistrate to correct any alleged error while the matter was fresh, not later seek correction through the High Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF
-
18-Mar-2026
Office Objection
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRMMO/185/2026
Case Summary: NCB v. Sandeep Singh & Others (Cr. MMO 185/2026) The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed the NCB's petition challenging the trial magistrate's orders regarding inventory certification in a drug seizure case. The NCB claimed vehicles were produced before the magistrate but inadvertently omitted from the certified inventory; however, the magistrate's order explicitly stated no vehicles were presented. The court held that once a magistrate's order records what transpired during hearing, such factual statements are conclusive and cannot be contradicted in higher courts. The NCB should have immediately approached the magistrate to correct any alleged error while the matter was fresh, not later seek correction through the High Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts