ATUL BHARDWAJ(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/2607/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010091992026

Filing Number

CWP/7774/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWP/2607/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ATUL BHARDWAJ(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Naresh K Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Vinay Mehta,AG 1123

  2. 2.The Director Health Services(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.The Chief Medical Officer, Chamba(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.Sunil Kakkar(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of Dr. Atul Bhardwaj's writ petition challenging his transfer order without quashing it, allowing him to file a representation for alternate posting adjustment within one week. The court directed the respondents to decide on the representation within two weeks, maintaining status quo of the petitioner's services until a decision is rendered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/2607/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of Dr. Atul Bhardwaj's writ petition challenging his transfer order without quashing it, allowing him to file a representation for alternate posting adjustment within one week. The court directed the respondents to decide on the representation within two weeks, maintaining status quo of the petitioner's services until a decision is rendered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case